With the knowledge of the sequential procedure for the unit root test, we would now test the data for R3M, R10Y, RGDP & M1/P with the Augmented Dicky-Fuller regression models of (model Ê with constant and trend), (model Ë with constant, no trend), and (model Ì with no constant and no trend).

From the SHAZAM output (see appendix 1), we can work through the following test with the respective data series:

 

R3M (raw data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 2 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary, no trend with possible drift.

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary

Ê

F 2 test with H0: (a ,r ) = (0,0) against H1: (a ,r ) ¹ (0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is random walk (unit root, no trend) with no drift.

Ë

F 1 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (0,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (0,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary with no drift (no trend determined earlier)

Ë

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restriction b =0 imposed)

Ì

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed)

Therefore, we can conclude that R3M is a random walk series (non-stationary, no trend) with zero drift.

R10Y (raw data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 5 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary, no trend with possible drift.

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary

Ê

F 2 test with H0: (a ,r ) = (0,0) against H1: (a ,r ) ¹ (0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is random walk (unit root, no trend) with no drift.

Ë

F 1 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (0,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (0,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary with no drift (no trend determined earlier)

Ë

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restriction b =0 imposed)

Ì

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed)

Therefore, we can conclude that R10Y is a random walk series (non-stationary, no trend) with zero drift.

RGDP (raw data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 2 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary, no trend with possible drift.

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary

Ê

F 2 test with H0: (a ,r ) = (0,0) against H1: (a ,r ) ¹ (0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Series is random walk (unit root, no trend) with non-zero drift.

Ë

F 1 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (0,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (0,0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Series is non-stationary with non-zero drift (no trend determined earlier)

Ë

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restriction b =0 imposed)

Do not need to test model Ì as one of the restriction a =0 is not true and thus the result will be biased!

Therefore, we can conclude that RGDP is a random walk series (non-stationary, no trend) with a non-zero drift.

M1/P (raw data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 5 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary, no trend with possible drift.

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary

Ê

F 2 test with H0: (a ,r ) = (0,0) against H1: (a ,r ) ¹ (0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is random walk (unit root, no trend) with no drift.

Ë

F 1 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (0,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (0,0,0)

test statistic < critical value (Do not reject H0)

Series is non-stationary with no drift (no trend determined earlier)

Ë

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restriction b =0 imposed)

Ì

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Verified that series is non-stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed)

Therefore, we can conclude that M1/P is a random walk series (non-stationary, no trend) with zero drift.

R3M (First-order differenced data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 8 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Could be either or or

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Could be either or , ie. no unit root.

Í *

T-test H0: b =0 against H1:b ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary (no unit root) with no trend.

Í *

T-test H0: a =0 against H1:a ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary with no trend and zero (no) drift.

Í *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (no unit root).

Ï *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed).
Therefore, we can conclude that the first-order differenced R3M is a stationary series (no unit root) with no trend and zero drift.
R10Y (First-order differenced data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 8 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Could be either or or

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Could be either or , ie. no unit root.

Í *

T-test H0: b =0 against H1:b ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary (no unit root) with no trend.

Í *

T-test H0: a =0 against H1:a ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary with no trend and zero (no) drift.

Í *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (no unit root).

Ï *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed).
Therefore, we can conclude that the first-order differenced R10Y is a stationary series (no unit root) with no trend and zero drift.
RGDP (First-order differenced data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 9 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Could be either or or

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Could be either or , ie. no unit root.

Í *

T-test H0: b =0 against H1:b ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary (no unit root) with no trend.

Í *

T-test H0: a =0 against H1:a ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Series is stationary with no trend and a non-zero drift.

Í *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (no unit root).

Î *

T-test H0: a =0 against H1:a ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series has a drift term (with restriction b =0 imposed).

Î *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (with restriction b =0 imposed).
Therefore, we can conclude that the first-order differenced RGDP is a stationary series (no unit root) with no trend and a non-zero drift.
M1/P (First-order differenced data)

Appropriate lag length suggested by SHAZAM is 4 for the analysis:

Test Model

Test Type &

Test Hypothesis

Test Result

Conclusion

Ê

F 3 test with H0: (a ,b ,r ) = (a ,0,0) against H1: (a ,b ,r ) ¹ (a ,0,0)

test statistic > critical value (Reject H0)

Could be either or or

Ê

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Could be either or , ie. no unit root.

Í *

T-test H0: b =0 against H1:b ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary (no unit root) with no trend.

Í *

T-test H0: a =0 against H1:a ¹ 0

t* < tcrit (Do not reject H0)

Series is stationary with no trend and zero (no) drift.

Í *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (no unit root).

Ï *

T-test H0: r =0 against H1:r ¹ 0

t* > tcrit (Reject H0)

Verified that series is stationary (with restrictions a =b =0 imposed).
Therefore, we can conclude that the first-order differenced M1/P is a stationary series (no unit root) with no trend and zero drift.

 

*Note: Model Í is from Appendix 2, or from Appendix 3.

Model Î is from Appendix 2, or from Appendix 3.

Model Ï is from Appendix 2, or from Appendix 3.

Thus, it was illustrated that the problem of non-stationarity of the raw data set of R3M, R10Y, RGDP, M1/P can be removed by taking first-order difference of the respective data. The unit root test has been used to verify the transition of non-stationary series of the raw data to a stationary one following first-order differencing at I(1).

[Back to Assignment 4]

Return to Assignments for Semester 1, 1998